Every requirement in the scorecard that has a score of less than 5 bars can be expanded to reveal
details on what quality indicators issues led to the given score.
When you click and expand a requirement in the analysis window, this also takes you to the
the requirement within the main document itself and highlights the source of the problem, helping you assess how to increase the clarity and quality of the requirement.
When a specific problem found is selected on the scorecard, the problematic terminology that lead
to the given score is highlighted within the requirement itself, helping you understand where exactly the requirement is not meeting best practices.
In the image above, an example is shown of a requirement with its problematic terminology highlighted by QVscribe: The imperative “shall” appears twice within the same requirement, as well as the vague phrase “be able to”, and the universal quantifier “No”. Terminology highlighting is done for all of the quality indicators, the universal quantifiers, the domain-specific terminology, and the measurement units.
Note: If some analysis results are inconsistent with your company standards, ensure that the
QVscribe Configuration being used is appropriate for the document, or talk to your QVscribe
administrator about creating a QVscribe configuration that more directly adheres to your specific